200 km/h - 0 (Metres) - Page 2

Tycoon · 10-03-2006, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just_me

Cars with low weight have an advantage over heavy cars.

Really????

Btw, i'm really curious why the M5 did so bad?

Bruce · 10-03-2006, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TycoonGTR

Really????

Btw, i'm really curious why the M5 did so bad?

Yeah, it is a little strange. The M5 was tested in warm weather too, about the same weather as the M6. The best i can say is that M5 didn't not have the M6's P-Zero tyres.

Just_me · 10-03-2006, 09:04 AM

SLR has ceramic brakes but not the CLK-DTM? how come, isnt CLK-DTM suppose to be the better trackcar than SLR?

Giannis · 10-03-2006, 09:09 AM

Does anyone has the 200-0 figures of some normal cars just to compare?

PS. I think AMS always in its 0-100, 0-150, etc had the figures of a normal ford focus just to compair to down-to-earth cars..

Bruce · 10-03-2006, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just_me

SLR has ceramic brakes but not the CLK-DTM? how come, isnt CLK-DTM suppose to be the better trackcar than SLR?

I wish i could answer that

However in all purposes it is true, the CLK DTM is a better track car than the SLR, it's a shame it lacks ceramic brakes.

Bruce · 10-03-2006, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giannis

Does anyone has the 200-0 figures of some normal cars just to compare?

PS. I think AMS always in its 0-100, 0-150, etc had the figures of a normal ford focus just to compair to down-to-earth cars..

Finding the 200 km/h-0 times are quite hard, the most down to earth car on that list is probably the Alfa Romeo 156 GTA with 161.3 metres

Giannis · 10-04-2006, 03:23 PM

hmm, and is it considered as a good or a bad one?

I wish i could now the figures of my car...

Mr. M · 10-04-2006, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7.3 AMG

Finding the 200 km/h-0 times are quite hard, the most down to earth car on that list is probably the Alfa Romeo 156 GTA with 161.3 metres

Any possibility of getting numbers for the Quattroporte?

Bruce · 10-05-2006, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giannis

hmm, and is it considered as a good or a bad one?

I wish i could now the figures of my car...

What have you got?

Bruce · 10-05-2006, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mirage77

Any possibility of getting numbers for the Quattroporte?

I'll see what i can find

10-03-2006, 09:04 AM	#13
Just_me Executive Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Posts: 15,487 Thanks: 1,062 Thanked 3,722 Times in 1,583 Posts	Re: 200 km/h - 0 (Metres) SLR has ceramic brakes but not the CLK-DTM? how come, isnt CLK-DTM suppose to be the better trackcar than SLR?

10-03-2006, 09:09 AM	#14
Giannis Devotee Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Patra, Greece Posts: 3,934 Thanks: 255 Thanked 301 Times in 232 Posts	Re: 200 km/h - 0 (Metres) Does anyone has the 200-0 figures of some normal cars just to compare? PS. I think AMS always in its 0-100, 0-150, etc had the figures of a normal ford focus just to compair to down-to-earth cars..

10-04-2006, 03:23 PM	#17
Giannis Devotee Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Patra, Greece Posts: 3,934 Thanks: 255 Thanked 301 Times in 232 Posts	Re: 200 km/h - 0 (Metres) hmm, and is it considered as a good or a bad one? I wish i could now the figures of my car...

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Sport Auto: 110 Metre Evasive	Bruce	Test Data	23	10-19-2007 01:42 PM
18 Metre Slalom	Bruce	Test Data	49	10-19-2007 01:40 PM
*NEW Mercedes-Benz Museum: I went!!!*	cawimmer430	The Mercedes-Benz Lounge	45	02-12-2007 04:43 AM
BMW M5 acceleration database	Just_me	5 Series	11	12-09-2006 12:29 PM
Ferrari 599 GTB - AMS Test Figures	Bruce	European Cars	52	10-04-2006 01:06 PM