| |
| | |||||||
| Internal Combustion My favorite car vs. your favorite car go here.. Boys with big toys behave! ;) |
| Welcome to Japanese Car Zone. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will be able to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #21 | |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bell CALIFORNIA
Posts: 633
Thanks: 40
Thanked 43 Times in 20 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) Quote:
What if I buy you a CLS55 ...... Would you take it ? ![]() | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Gothenburg
Posts: 13,186
Thanks: 257
Thanked 1,235 Times in 678 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) ooo..that was a nasty post.. the thread started smelling after this.. haha.. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bell CALIFORNIA
Posts: 633
Thanks: 40
Thanked 43 Times in 20 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) BTW , this thread is so full of s**t and bias , whether it's the Motortrend test or the posts of some ignorant members here . ![]() |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Advocate ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 504
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 6 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) All I know is that the M5 was only marginally faster than the CLS55 and I don't live at a race track so this is pointless. I already have an M5 so I'm a little biast in its favor but I love the CLS55. It's the best looking Mercedes on the market today! I'm with Roberto, I'll take a 911 over either of these!! If you want a good video of the M5 vs CLS battle, check out this video. - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 116
Thanked 153 Times in 113 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) Quote:
Yep, that is rather funny and strange. The CLS55 sweeps faster resulting in higher skidpad numbers.(0.90g vs. 0.87g) It`s "defalt mode" numbers are also better. | |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 116
Thanked 153 Times in 113 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) Quote:
Marginally better is correct! the CLS55 did quit well considering it has less hp and a 5-speed tranny. I didn`t know you have an M5 Porsche Guy, congrats. | |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Executive ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 15,487
Thanks: 1,062
Thanked 3,722 Times in 1,583 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) Quote:
![]() wow, you taking it way to serious. BMW fans into our cars, yeah like MB fans are different One negative comment about MB and you go bazooka...Buy me one and of course I take it, Im not stupid ![]() BTW, Im so sad cause you havent made a comment in my supergoodthread http://germancarzone.com/showthread.php?t=3201 Last edited by Just_me; 03-09-2006 at 04:27 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Executive ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 15,487
Thanks: 1,062
Thanked 3,722 Times in 1,583 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) Quote:
CLS has a lower center of gravity. M6 has better skidpads than M5 because it has lower center of gravity. Also tires is a big part when it comes to skidpad. This is nothing strange. But Im sure you knew this already. | |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 116
Thanked 153 Times in 113 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) Quote:
M6 wasn`t in this test so asking for skidpad numbers wouldn`t be relevant. In addition to a lower center of gravity the Airmatic suspension in the CLS is design to counter body roll. That might have played a roll as well. | |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Executive ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 15,487
Thanks: 1,062
Thanked 3,722 Times in 1,583 Posts
| Re: Motor Trend: M5 VS CLS55 AMG (Part II) Quote:
Car&driver comparison M5 vs CLS55 Car, 2.0 mile roadcourse time, 70-0 braking ft, skidpad g, lane change mph CLS55, 1:32.55, / 161,/ .93, / 63.7 E60 M5,1:31.25, / 158, / .89, / 65.6 Once again CLS55 has higher skidpad g Last edited by Just_me; 03-09-2006 at 04:48 PM.. | |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| amg, cls55, motor, part, trend |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ***Amerang: German Car Museum*** (Part II, 1942-1982) | cawimmer430 | The Pit - General Discussion | 9 | 11-10-2006 04:46 PM |
| BMW 3er Coupe & cabrio, part 3 (unmasked pics incl.!) | EnI | 3 Series | 263 | 02-24-2006 04:16 PM |
| Motortrend: M5 vs CLS55 | Just_me | Internal Combustion | 85 | 02-06-2006 04:31 PM |
| Motor Trend: Cadillac STS-v vs Mercedes CLS55 | bmwrules | Internal Combustion | 3 | 12-05-2005 10:15 AM |
| Amerang: German Car Museum (Part I: 1885-1942) | cawimmer430 | The Pit - General Discussion | 10 | 11-08-2005 04:55 PM |