| |
| | |||||||
| Internal Combustion My favorite car vs. your favorite car go here.. Boys with big toys behave! ;) |
| Welcome to Japanese Car Zone. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will be able to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| View Poll Results: WHICH? | |||
| S65 AMG | | 28 | 59.57% |
| Flying Spur | | 19 | 40.43% |
| Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,957
Thanks: 270
Thanked 128 Times in 90 Posts
| S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Ok I thought this would be kind of interesting comparison because in terms of price and engine size the most comparable car the the S65 is actually the Bentley flying Spur. Their prices are similar and their performance is very similar. So, what would you rather have, an S65 AMG or a Bentley Flying Spur. Both very sexy cars, indeed. Bentley Flying Spur: Engine Type: W12, Twin-turbo Displacement cu in (cc): 366 (5998) Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 560(411) / 6100 Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 479(650) / 1600 Redline at RPM: n.a. Brakes & Tires Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc Tires F-R: 275/40 R19 Exterior Dimensions & Weight Length × Width × Height in: 208.9 × 83.4 × 58.2 Weight lb (kg): 5456 (2475) Performance Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 4.9 Top Speed mph (km/h): 195 (312) Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a. Price: $170,000 S65 AMG: Engine Type: V12, Biturbo Displacement cu in (cc): 365 (5980) Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 604(450) / 4800 Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 738(1000) / 2000-4000 Redline at RPM: 5950 Brakes & Tires Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc Tires F-R: 255/40 ZR19 - 275/40 ZR19 Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive Exterior Dimensions & Weight Length × Width × Height in: n.a. Weight lb (kg): n.a. Performance Acceleration 0-60 mph s: 4.2 Top Speed mph (km/h): 155 (250) - electronically limited Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): 13/20 (n.a.) Price: $169,000 S65 ![]() ![]() ![]() not an S65 (but theres just not enough photos of S65 interior) ![]() FLYING SPUR ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Matt; 02-06-2006 at 09:53 PM.. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Gothenburg
Posts: 13,186
Thanks: 257
Thanked 1,235 Times in 678 Posts
| Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? lol one of those pics with the mocca steering is the CLK DTM PS The FS is a frog.. and the S65 is the hottest sedan on earth.. this could not be easier for me.. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,957
Thanks: 270
Thanked 128 Times in 90 Posts
| Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? I dont think so^. I think the Spur is elegant and more discreet than the flashy S 65. notice: these cars are direct competitors, both have the same price, both have 12 cylinder engines, both are twin turbo charged. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 116
Thanked 153 Times in 113 Posts
| Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? S65! it`s supposed to have flash, it`s an AMG unlike the normal S-Class. Plus the S-Class has gotton quit a few awards, it`s a winner! ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Devotee ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,572
Thanks: 53
Thanked 175 Times in 90 Posts
| Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
Unfortunetely I haven't seen either of these cars in person so I just have no idea. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,957
Thanks: 270
Thanked 128 Times in 90 Posts
| Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? look at the wood in the Bentley...Its just beutiful. I personally like the interior of the Spur better. Its so "lush" and cushy yet the wood is classy and very beautiful (it looks like oak or something). |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 116
Thanked 153 Times in 113 Posts
| Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? I`m not impressed with the Bently FS. Give me the S65, now if I were older the Bently might work....., naaaaa! S65 |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,766
Thanks: 492
Thanked 673 Times in 318 Posts
| Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? S65, Flying Spur is OK. Saw one yesterday and I thought it was just OK, they didn't do enough to differentiate the sedan from the coupe. Boring design, IMO. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 116
Thanked 153 Times in 113 Posts
| Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,957
Thanks: 270
Thanked 128 Times in 90 Posts
| Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? This poll will turn around. Lets just weight for the Audi boys. You know its hot! |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| bentley, flying, s65, spur |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top Gear - Bentley Flying Spur. | Yannis | Sound and Vision | 7 | 02-07-2006 12:51 PM |
| Flying Spur | SDNR | Bentley Motors Limited | 15 | 01-24-2006 07:40 AM |
| Bentley Arnage T Vs. Bentley Flying Spur Vs. Maybach 57S | SDNR | Internal Combustion | 56 | 12-14-2005 02:39 AM |
| Bentley seems to be winning the "ultra-luxury" battle. | SDNR | Bentley Motors Limited | 8 | 11-01-2005 05:49 PM |