Japanese Car Zone
    

Go Back   Japanese Car Zone > Website Forums > Internal Combustion

Internal Combustion My favorite car vs. your favorite car go here.. Boys with big toys behave! ;)



Welcome to Japanese Car Zone.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will be able to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please,
join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2007, 12:37 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Merc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Aurora IL USA
Posts: 7,313
Thanks: 1,561
Thanked 2,270 Times in 1,044 Posts
Merc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to beholdMerc1 is a splendid one to behold
Edmunds Inside Line - Comparison Test: 08' Mustang Shelby GT vs. 08' Impreza WRX STI















































Boost vs. Brawn


Look no further than the hood scoops on the 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX STI and 2007 Ford Shelby GT to find the fundamental difference in their personalities. It's here that both cars' sense of purpose and ability is displayed prominently and publicly as a statement of their true character.

Integrated into the STI's hood is an elegant and somewhat menacing scoop that feeds air through the engine's intercooler. It's a functional and defining detail on all boosted Subarus and it enhances the car's already purposeful demeanor.

On the Shelby's hood lies a nonfunctional remnant of days gone by. Days when bias-ply tires were making the smoke. Days when performance was measured by the number of barrels in your carburetor. Days when cars were built with the delicate precision of dynamite. From the driver seat, we could see underneath the Mustang's hood scoop to the road ahead, a constant reminder that it's phony and just plain disappointing on a car that bears the name of such a legend.

Same Price Tag, Different State of Mind

So why compare two cars whose target customers are so different? Well, first of all, they cost the same. The STI is slightly pricier at $39,440, only marginally more than the $39,180 Shelby. With as-tested prices within $300 of each other, the reality of cross-shopping these two on price alone isn't an arguable point.

We'd argue that there's another common mission between the two: putting a smile on their owners' faces. Really, they're both about having fun. Whether that fun means late-night powerslides in the Wal-Mart parking lot or Sunday morning pace-note sessions up your local canyon road, depends only on your state of mind.

Plus, these two machines are remarkably similar in the power department. The STI's 2.5-liter turbocharged flat-4 is rated at 305 horsepower and 290 pound-feet of torque. The Shelby's 4.6-liter V8 is stronger than that, but not by much. It generates 319 hp and 330 lb-ft of torque, slightly more than a standard Mustang thanks to a more efficient exhaust system, cold air intake and a revised engine calibration (which mandates premium fuel). A six-speed manual transmission puts the STI's power to all four wheels, while a five-speed manual drives the Shelby's rears.

Doughnuts and Horseplay

Plant your right foot to the Shelby's floorboard and you're rewarded with an engine note so patriotic you'd swear Francis Scott Key tuned the car's dual exhaust. It's a deep, powerful sound that perfectly accompanies the thrust that comes with it. It'll take $800 in custom exhaust to get this much aural reward from the STI and even then it will only be pleasing if you happen to like the off-kilter thrum of a flat-4.

What's more, a dip of the clutch and jab at the throttle is a sure key to the best powerslides this side of a GT500. The Shelby GT's balance on smooth surfaces is good and the information it offers a driver through its chassis is encouraging enough that we found ourselves with ample confidence to drive it very hard. Its steering is light but responsive and communicative enough to inspire reasonable confidence. There are few rewards in life greater than executing a perfect, tire-smoking powerslide, gathering it up and pulling up confidently at the next signal. This happens often in the Shelby GT. It's the kind of fun you can't have in any Subaru. But like mullets and mopeds, it's a bit of a novelty.

If outright speed is your jones, you should buy the STI. This latest version of Subaru's flagship is silly fast on any surface you choose. It eats midcorner bumps like a turbodiesel wood chipper sucking down a sapling. It treats road irregularities, gravel and damp surfaces with the same indifference the Shelby does burnouts — they're all in a day's work.

Very few cars sold today will match the STI's midcorner speed. Nor will they exercise its mind-bending grip on the tarmac with such relaxed confidence. Its electronically controlled center differential and front and rear mechanical limited-slip differentials twist any road into submission.

The staggering speed comes from perfectly managing this combination of long-travel suspension, substantial power and Velcro-like grip. Part of that management strategy includes the three-way SI-Drive throttle switch on the console that allows the driver to adjust throttle response between pointlessly slow and just right. There are also nine settings for the center differential — three auto and six manual — which is too many, but testifies to the amount of control a driver has in this car. Bottom line: There's not a Mustang made that will match it on any real road.

Inside and Out

Unless a few Shelby badges and a high-effort Hurst shifter are your idea of interior upgrades, you won't notice much difference between the office of a Shelby GT and a standard Mustang. There are the same slick, flat seats, built-to-cost Ford switchgear and materials and presentation we've come to accept at the standard Mustang's $25,000 cost of entry. But this car adds a 55 percent premium, which isn't reflected in its interior.

The STI provides the expected bump in quality. From its Alcantara suede-and-leather-covered seats to its double stitching, to new plastics, there's a very different feel inside an STI than there is in a WRX. Too bad its six-speed tranny isn't as quick-shifting or precise as we'd expect given its direct-shift configuration, and its seats are too wide to be as supportive as we'd like. Still, they're better than the Mustang's wide, flat chairs.

There's also a simple three-knob climate control system where the Shelby has only fan speed, temperature and mode dials. Our STI was fitted with the optional navigation system, which more than compensates for the minimal price difference between the two.

Outside, neither car will be mistaken for its lesser counterpart. Most obvious are the STI's huge fenders. Bulging at every opportunity, the new shape has the same polarizing effect on Subaru enthusiasts as did the new WRX. We think the hatchback shape expands its appeal to buyers who might have previously overlooked it as too boy racerish. But love it or hate it, you're not going to overlook it.

The Shelby offers equally juiced-up exterior styling. In 2007 it was only available in black or white but will be produced in Vista Blue with the same silver stripes for the 2008 model year. There's a unique front fascia, lower airdam and side scoops plus the not-a-hood scoop. Eighteen-inch Torque Thrust look-alike wheels are at all four corners. The wheels, scoops and stripes, however faux-retro, are striking in combination with the GT's black paint.

Living Life 13 Seconds at a Time

Predictably, the Shelby is 157 pounds heavier than the STI (3,508 vs. 3,351 pounds), which didn't help its case in our acceleration tests.

All-wheel grip and lots of grunt give the less powerful Subaru the ability to outrun the Shelby out of the hole — an advantage it holds all the way to the end of the quarter-mile. With an admittedly abusive launch, our STI hit 60 in 4.8 seconds — 0.4 second quicker than the Shelby.

Breaking the traps in 13.3 seconds, the Subaru's lead remains the same. Pulling hard, the Shelby gets there in 13.7 seconds, and has a 1.5-mph advantage in trap speed (103.9 mph vs.102.4 mph).

If drag racing is your thing, the Mustang is your car. Slap on some drag radials and it'll likely run with the STI. Plus, it feels a hell of a lot less likely to self-destruct during a day of redline launches. Subarus have always proven durable during our testing, but the physical load on the STI's drivetrain during a hard launch is unquestionably violent.

Brakes are another area where the hardware and engineering advantage of the Japanese car is apparent. Stopping from 60 in only 106 feet, the STI is in a different league than the Shelby, which requires 126 feet.

Look closely at the hardware and the Subaru's value and performance are clear. The STI is fitted with 13.0-inch rotors and four-piston Brembo calipers up front, while the Mustang makes due with 11.5-inch rotors and two-piston calipers. Perhaps an even greater factor in our single-stop test are each car's tires. The lighter STI's 245/40R18 Dunlop SP Sport 600 summer tires are far stickier than the Shelby's 235/50ZR18 BFGoodrich g-Force KDWS all-season tires.

Straightening the Curves, Flattening the Hills

Those stickier tires also helped the STI embarrass the Shelby in the slalom. At 72.0 mph this is the fastest Subaru we've ever tested. Despite its Ford Racing handling package, which is lower and more heavily damped than a stock Mustang, the Shelby only managed 68.0 mph — exactly the same speed as Ford's GT500. Unfortunately, the lower suspension lacks both travel and compliance, giving the GT a wagonlike ride.

Around the skid pad, however, the Shelby was surprisingly close, circling at 0.88g vs. the STI's 0.90g. It once again demonstrated the always-engaging ability to drive in never-ending sideways circles with a white haze pouring off its rear tires. Did we mention that this is fun? Or that it can't be done in a Subaru?

More valuable than our instrumented handling data is each car's real-world behavior. It's here that the Subaru's abilities are dramatically greater than the Shelby's. Its ride is compliant but controlled — a near-perfect compromise. In the real world where there are bumps, off-camber roads and gravel, there's simply no contest. On one winding California road we reached the Mustang's limits (and its bump stops) before the STI's driver even knew we were trying to keep up.

The Easy Winner

Unpack the data and the driving impressions and the results are overwhelmingly clear. In fact, out of the 46 categories scored in this test, the STI gave up only two to the Shelby: as-tested price and quarter-mile trap speed. It tied or won every single category in our 27-point evaluation, dominated when it came to feature content and was every editor's personal and recommended pick. That's kicking some major ass.

Of course this doesn't tell the whole story. The Shelby will put a grin on your face as quickly as it will autograph the tarmac in your local Wal-Mart parking lot. This, while great fun, is of limited value, which is why the Subaru wins. It's quicker in virtually every test and unquestionably quicker over any road. It rides and handles better and its interior is light-years ahead of the Shelby.

The takeaway is simple. If you want a driver's car, one that's as capable in a straight line as it is on virtually any road, the STI is your car.

There is one more little thing: Its hood scoop actually works.



Video:

- ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


M
Merc1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Merc1 For This Useful Post:
Guibo (12-17-2007)

Old 12-17-2007, 03:13 AM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 86
Thanks: 121
Thanked 146 Times in 46 Posts
Guibo is a jewel in the roughGuibo is a jewel in the roughGuibo is a jewel in the roughGuibo is a jewel in the rough
Re: Edmunds Inside Line - Comparison Test: 08' Mustang Shelby GT vs. 08' Impreza WRX

The Shelby GT gets blown out of the water. Looks great in that rear-quarter shot, but having the Shelby name and a fake hood scoop? C'mon. That white retro ball shifter looks like an eyesore. And for a performance model, those are some pretty lousy tires. I'm hoping the Bullitt does much better than this.
Wow, those prices are really creeping up there. A GT500 starts at only a couple more grand than that Shelby. Granted most dealers are asking a lot more than that for GT500's, but still.
Guibo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks
Search Cloud
"2009 porsche 911 turbo" "alshner" "aston grille" mx-5 "dinan 135i" "images: motor forecast" "measure" "nonstop server" "performance" -job -courses "rona cortez" "scuttle shake" 944 +leon +"je design" +montage 2009 audi rs4 2009 mazda 6 ts2 optional sat-nav 2009 wrx 2011 amg m157 5.5liter v8 333is alpina 997 turbo s alfa 169 photo amg+w124 audi a3 audi a3 new audi a8l for sale audi s3 8l audi s5 audi tt 3.2 california audi-a3 benefits of benz 230e w123 bmw 3 series bmw 3 series e90 bmw 333is bmw 335i coupe review bmw e90 torsional-rigidity bmw m6 2008 cabriolet bmw-x3 mix-your-playgrounds bugatti c class w204 umi navigation cadllica cars car zone japan carneol red c63 real life picture carzone carzone michele lupini carzone tuning e46 individual color flewitt coachbuilders fortuner g37x coupe g63 amg 2010 picture glasurit fer 305/c glasurit fer 604/c golf vi variant hardcore japan honda honda accord honda accord coupe 2008 itzkirbphotography.com jaguar x351 japane carzone japanese car zone japanese carzone japanesecarforum.com kelleners k3 s e30 koenesig ccx lambo suv lambo's lamborghini muira larry dominique 370z lexus rs400h vs mercedes ml320 cdi lorinser w221 m6 manhas farcry pc mazda 6 mazda 6 2.5 sport mazda5 mercedes 600 landaulet mercedes c126 amg mercedes c280 review mercedes e 280 mercedes e65 mercedes w112 heckflosse mercedes w204 audio 20 umi mercedes w204 umi mercedes-benz coupe design study with the four-eye face in geneva in 1993 mix-your-playgrounds nissan gt-r merc1 pagani zonda #76060 pagani zonda 76060 pagani zonda vin paganikon seat leon fr1 skoda yeti slk 2011 ssangsyong web site test 2008 audi a4 b8 2.0 tdi track tested 2008 honda accord w126 w204 c180 review in singapore w211 e320 faults w461 g wagon canada wada satoshi audi a5 wallpapers japan www.japanesecarzone.com

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 PM.