Japanese Car Zone
    

Go Back   Japanese Car Zone > Website Forums > Internal Combustion

Internal Combustion My favorite car vs. your favorite car go here.. Boys with big toys behave! ;)



Welcome to Japanese Car Zone.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will be able to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please,
join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2007, 08:51 AM   #51
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 35
Thanks: 327
Thanked 63 Times in 14 Posts
Bilal will become famous soon enough
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

Actually, lets settle this WEIGHT thing once and for all.

The EU standard of weight measurement of a STANDARD, FACTORY-SPEC car with NO OPTIONS other than those that come standard, HAS TO HAVE:

1).Driver (68kgs)
2).Tank filled to 90%
3). Luggage (7kgs)

This standard applies to all manufacturers in the European Union.

Therefore, the weight of the M3 and C63 under this standard is as follows:

M3 - 1655kgs.
C63 - 1730kgs.
RS4 (just for comparison) 1710kgs.

(All figures from manufacturers website)

A total difference of 85kgs between the C63 and M3.

Now, I don't know about the rest of you but I'd be hard pressed to tell that difference if driving both cars. The only way I can see the testers rant on about the weight difference between these cars and how the M3 feels sharper is actually down to the engineering of both cars. The M3 is designed to be much livelier and with alumnium suspension components, no doubt quicker to change direction.
The C63 is designed with just a deliberate hint of understeer for MB safety reasons and with weight distribution that is heavier up-front, results in the car not being as 'lively' to turn-in.

I actually have read somewhere that the 6.3 AMG engine is lighter than BMW M's 4.0 V8, but seeing as how that could be down to different measurements, I'll leave that out of the discussion.

So please, do not assume that the C63 is a 'lard-ass'.
Bilal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bilal For This Useful Post:
atuv (11-04-2007), Bruce (11-04-2007), cawimmer430 (11-04-2007), Steve (11-04-2007)

Old 11-04-2007, 10:05 AM   #52
Executive
 
Just_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 15,487
Thanks: 1,062
Thanked 3,722 Times in 1,583 Posts
Just_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

Quote:
Originally Posted by atuv View Post
What's wrong Andreas?

I just like the C63 and impressed with it and was just stating my feelings!! and the formula i'm using is that despite the hefty 200kg weight difference it still handled really well for a heavy sedan facing a much lighter coupe with a lower center of gravity,got my point?
Im alright dude

like you I like the C63 but I dont consider is as a miracle on 4 wheels. C63 is no more impressive than any other car on this planet.
Jesus walking on water was a miracle, C63 is not
Just_me is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Old 11-04-2007, 04:19 PM   #53
Fanatic
 
atuv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,198
Thanks: 440
Thanked 81 Times in 78 Posts
atuv has a spectacular aura aboutatuv has a spectacular aura about
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_me View Post
Im alright dude

like you I like the C63 but I dont consider is as a miracle on 4 wheels. C63 is no more impressive than any other car on this planet.
Jesus walking on water was a miracle, C63 is not
C63 is no miracle of course so is any other car(maybe there's a few exceptions ) so i was just expressing my admiration for the car also the M3 is a superb machine and would love to own one if i can afford it
atuv is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Old 11-04-2007, 07:17 PM   #54
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 86
Thanks: 121
Thanked 146 Times in 46 Posts
Guibo is a jewel in the roughGuibo is a jewel in the roughGuibo is a jewel in the roughGuibo is a jewel in the rough
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

Regarding the EU weight standard, can someone shed some light on how measurements are taken? Are all of these weights actually measured by an independent governing body (ie, the EU)?

It seems odd to me that so many C63 tests show a curb weight (minus the driver and luggage) of over 1800kg. C&D's test of a car on 18" wheels (without the Performance Package) yielded a curb weight of 1834kg. Meanwhile, Autocar's test of a well-optioned M3 (on 19" wheels and with EDC) showed 1625kg. Autocar generally weighs with a full tank. The EU-standard base/stripper M3 should weigh about 1588kg, without driver & luggage but with a full tank. This indicates that Autocar's M3 had about 37kg's worth of options, assuming BMW figures are accurate. (Sport Auto's M3 weighed within 20kg of the theoretical 1588kg figure).
If we apply the same to the standard C63, it should weigh about 1665kg with a full 74-liter tank. Yet the lightest-recorded C63 so far (AMuS, with 18" wheels) is 1803kg. A difference of 138 kg from the theoretical. This means that the options in that lightest C63 (possibly w/o Performance package) weigh 3.7 times more than the options of that M3 on 19" wheels and with EDC. What could possibly make for this difference?

With respect to weight, weight distribution and turn-in...
If we assume that indeed Mercedes' engine is lighter by any significant amount, then it should theoretically be easier to acheive 50/50 weight distribution, with the AMG's longer length also contributing, correct? The M3's turn-in advantage points not only to a difference in suspension (which also retains better ride comfort over bumpy roads), but it looks like there is a payoff in centralizing the mass, if the overall mass difference is not significant. If so, then we should expect to see the 4-door, steel-roofed M3 lose this advantage, assuming similar suspension settings compared to the coupe. This last point is of particular note to the C63: despite the harder suspension settings (required to reign in an apparently lighter V8 and neglible 85kg overall difference?) it is no more agile or nimble than the relatively supple M3, while losing the comfort advantage of the previous car.
Guibo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Guibo For This Useful Post:
Bilal (11-04-2007), bmer (11-05-2007), Bruce (11-04-2007)

Old 11-04-2007, 07:42 PM   #55
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 35
Thanks: 327
Thanked 63 Times in 14 Posts
Bilal will become famous soon enough
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

Guibo, you have highlighted this immense discrepancy between the weight figures. The figures I quoted are from the manufacturer's website. I tend to trust these and disregard the figures produced by magazines - which as your post shows, tends to greatly confuse matters.

I cannot say how these measurements are taken and I would take these measurements with a grain of salt in any event, since manufacturers have a way of boosting power figures more than the stated amount in order to compensate for any additional weight. For example, I was told once that the German TUV which measures, amongst other things, the power produced by a car has to be within 5% of the stated power. I don't know about you, but 5% of 457 horsepower seems quite substantial - and a 500hp C63 would be just within this stated range!

As for the handling differences. I believe the M3 has much better weight distribution than the C63 (much closer to 50:50 than the C63) and is perhaps better engineered with regards to load transfer when turning and stopping etc..Additionally BMW M have used lighter suspension components which further balances and reduces load transfer during turning or stopping.
The C63 is by contrast, nose heavy. Therefore in any turning or braking situation the already heavier front end is going to exacerbate load transfer to the front making it feel heavier and less nimble. We'll leave the M3 Saloon out just right now as it has not been driven by reviewers.


I have already stated that the 6.3 may be lighter than the 4.0 BMW engine but that could be down to different measurements and as such cannot enter the equation.


FYI, C63 weight distribution is 54/46:

- ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER
Bilal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Bilal For This Useful Post:
Guibo (11-04-2007)

Old 11-05-2007, 03:56 AM   #56
Advocate
 
coolraoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: France (but actually internship in Germany)
Posts: 943
Thanks: 183
Thanked 371 Times in 206 Posts
coolraoul is a jewel in the roughcoolraoul is a jewel in the roughcoolraoul is a jewel in the roughcoolraoul is a jewel in the roughcoolraoul is a jewel in the rough
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

The C63 actually has an heavy automatic transmission; it may will be lighter with the upcoming DSG?
coolraoul is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Old 11-05-2007, 04:51 AM   #57
Devotee
 
bmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,904
Thanks: 1,547
Thanked 669 Times in 405 Posts
bmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to allbmer is a name known to all
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

Has the DCT been officially confirmed for the C 63?
bmer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Old 11-05-2007, 04:56 AM   #58
Advocate
 
coolraoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: France (but actually internship in Germany)
Posts: 943
Thanks: 183
Thanked 371 Times in 206 Posts
coolraoul is a jewel in the roughcoolraoul is a jewel in the roughcoolraoul is a jewel in the roughcoolraoul is a jewel in the roughcoolraoul is a jewel in the rough
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

Not yet I think, but it comes. Mornhinweg smiles when you tell him you don't like the Speedshift on the C63, and some W212 AMG were spied with a DSG... It is coming, at last. I hope it will be on the SL63 Black Series.
coolraoul is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Old 11-05-2007, 04:56 AM   #59
Executive
 
Just_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 15,487
Thanks: 1,062
Thanked 3,722 Times in 1,583 Posts
Just_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmer View Post
Has the DCT been officially confirmed for the C 63?
they have hinted that DCT is under development but no words on when. I doubt its coming for C63, instead we have to wait for next E63. Like 2009/2010.
Just_me is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Old 11-05-2007, 06:07 AM   #60
Advocate
 
Sunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 936
Thanks: 475
Thanked 183 Times in 117 Posts
Sunny is a jewel in the roughSunny is a jewel in the roughSunny is a jewel in the roughSunny is a jewel in the rough
Re: Motortrend: M3 vs C63 vs RS4

Quote:
Originally Posted by coolraoul View Post
The C63 actually has an heavy automatic transmission; it may will be lighter with the upcoming DSG?
DCT is not a light weight transmission - it has 2 clutches and the hydraulics to automatically shift and clutch and declutch. In the end, most transmissions, the weight is dictated by the torque they have to handle, so don't expect much weight saving from the transmission.
Sunny is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
c63, motortrend, rs4
Search Cloud
"2009 porsche 911 turbo" "cars as fashion" "hannes oosthuizen" "johan wejedal" "loic kernen" 2008 honda accord 2009 audi r8 2009 wrx 3mturing 600 swb amazing car amg+w124 antivirus astra sedan audi a3 audi a4 b8 s line audi a5 audi a8 audi on gallardo wheels audi rs audi rs 8 audi rs4 b5 audi rs6 audi rs6 new audi rs8 audi s3 audi s5 benz 230e w123 bmw 3 series bmw 333is bmw 502 for sale bmw e30 333is bmw sport bugatti c class w204 umi navigation car zone car zone japan carzone carzone japan carzone tuning cl63 amg ferarri wallpaper fiat sedici flewitt coachbuilders fortuner ganizonda hamann m6 hanomag rl20 zu verkaufen honda honda accord coupe 2008 honda civic honda civic mugen rr honda fit http://www.japanesecarzone.com/q7/11986-audi-q7-got-tangled.html interior designer bmw f01/2 inurl:thread funkey itzkirbphotography.com japanese car zone japanese carzone japanesecarforum.com japanesecarzone.com koenesig koenesig ccx lambo's lamborghini alar lamborghini embolado lamborghini muira lamborghinis lexus rs400h vs mercedes ml320 cdi m6 maxima interior mazda5 mercedes 600 swb mercedes c tenorit mercedes c126 amg mercedes pre-save inactive mercedes w112 heckflosse mercedes w204 umi new audi rs6 nissan gt-r merc1 pagani zonda vin paganikon phaeton playboy mustang rav4 rs4 rs8 seat leon fr1 skyline gtr skywarim skywarim drive tiguan toyota venza volt concept vw torsional rigidity nm/degree w126 w204 interior w204 palladium silver w211 e320 faults www.japanesecarzone.com

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.