| |
| | |||||||
| CLS-Class C219 Currently in Production (2005 - Based on W211 platform |
| Welcome to Japanese Car Zone. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will be able to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 481
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) Am I wrong or is there really a f*cking trouble about that LC-thing???! Last edited by Kleemann_SL; 11-10-2005 at 12:14 PM. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,957
Thanks: 270
Thanked 128 Times in 90 Posts
| Re: CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) Thanks for the article, it doesnt sound like there big M5 fans... |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Australia
Posts: 1,391
Thanks: 154
Thanked 105 Times in 75 Posts
| Re: CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) I can't see the article. Matt, Motor Magazine in the past used to have wet dreams over anything BMW touched by the M house. What seems to be their complaints about the M5? What was the outcome of the comparison here? ![]() |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,957
Thanks: 270
Thanked 128 Times in 90 Posts
| Re: CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) Well, they dont think the M5 is an easy car to drive at slower speeds with SMG III. They think its the best track car and is the fastest but for day to day driving they would rather drive the CLS 55 AMG. They also think the HSV was out classed by the two germans. So ultimately I think the favorite was the CLS in terms of looks and torque. They dont seem to like how the M5 revs so high. They also call it an ugly car. So thats the verdict. The CLS 55. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Australia
Posts: 1,391
Thanks: 154
Thanked 105 Times in 75 Posts
| Re: CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) Ahh ok thanks. I've never driven an SMG car, so I know crap all about the transmissions lol. It's funny how they always compare the HSV's to these fine Germans. A couple of years back a few of the magazines actually went on about how the HSV's were sooo close to the germans, but 1/2 the price. ![]() |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,766
Thanks: 492
Thanked 673 Times in 318 Posts
| Re: CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) CLS55 has a sick interior, the new 63 will be interesting when up pitted against the M5, can't wait to see what happens then. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,957
Thanks: 270
Thanked 128 Times in 90 Posts
| Re: CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) I think the M5 might be out classed with new 63 engines...... But I still dont think they will be able to compete in the handling department. when the E55 AMG came out it was much quicker but wasn't as good as a racer as the E39 M5 because of handling. I think..... |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Australia
Posts: 1,391
Thanks: 154
Thanked 105 Times in 75 Posts
| Re: CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) While AMG is going all out in the engine deparment, I really hope they pay more attention to dynamics, if only for the sake of winning more comparison tests. ![]() |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,957
Thanks: 270
Thanked 128 Times in 90 Posts
| Re: CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) Well the CLS was that much better than the E class so I'm sure the next E63 will have stiffened suspension more handling oriented. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,766
Thanks: 492
Thanked 673 Times in 318 Posts
| Re: CLS 55 vs. M5 (Australian Motor Magazine Comparison Test) Quote:
| |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| australian, cls, comparison, magazine, motor, test |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Diesel And Hybrid Technology In 3210-Mile Endurance Test | Alx | The Mercedes-Benz Lounge | 15 | 11-04-2005 01:01 PM |
| BMW 5-series failed the 'elk test'! | Yannis | 5 Series | 57 | 11-03-2005 02:54 AM |