Review: Pentax K100D

Choleric · 12-04-2006, 01:12 AM

As some of you know, this the camera I am planning on purchasing in the coming weeks, and it has recently been in-depth reviewed over at dpreview.com so I thought I'd share it. In the review they compare to likeable cameras; Nikon D50/40, and Canon 350d, as well as much more to read about.

- ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Quote:

Conclusion - Pros

-About as good as six megapixel resolution gets, crisp and detailed, a big improvement
-Excellent detail even at higher ISO's, overall noise levels on par with competition
-Effective long exposure noise reduction (necessary too)
-Accurate and fast auto-focus, although focus motor slightly noisy
-Occasionally useful 'digital preview' allows you to take a test shot which isn't saved
-Unique-to-Pentax 'Auto Pict' dynamically selects scene modes
-Customizable Auto ISO (200 - 800/400/1600/3200)
-Good built-in flash metering
-In-camera Shake Reduction system offers some advantage in low light
-Mirror lock-up implemented as part of the self-timer
-Compact design with good ergonomics
-Function menu for quick access to important settings (although hard buttons are better)
-Large, bright and high resolution LCD monitor
-Proper hinged doors covering the connectors (not the cheap rubber bungs)
-In-camera image retouching (B&W, Sepia, Soft etc.)
-Good supplied software bundle, Silkypix RAW conversion engine works well
-Uses standard AA batteries as well as CR-V3 Lithium
-USB 2.0 Hi-Speed interface (with mass storage device driver)
-Value for money (even more so if you sacrifice SR and go for the K110D)

Conclusion - Cons

-Limited continuous shooting capability, buffer only large enough for four JPEG frames
-Over-saturated default image tone ('Bright'), can lead to channel clipping
-Relatively loud shutter release
-Slightly humorous user interface compromise ('Cntnuos expsr')
-No orientation sensor (hence orientation not recorded)
-Top LCD panel has no backlight
-Slightly less dynamic range at ISO 200 than at ISO 400
-Large RAW files (10 MB; not losslessly compressed)
-No simultaneous RAW+JPEG option
-Viewfinder view not as big as *ist DS (although still comparatively good)
-Automatic ISO does not work when exposure compensation is set
-Average automatic white balance performance, still very poor under incandescent light
-No Program Shift in Program AE mode
-Flash must be raised for AF assist (although AF works even in very low light)
-No Kelvin white balance option
-Color space selection buried in custom menu

Overall conclusion

When we reviewed the *ist DS it was a camera which equally surprised and disappointed; on one hand it was one of those cameras which functioned beyond its expectation or billing, and on the other it disappointed with its relatively poor in-camera image processor, which simply wasn't delivering the results we knew the camera was capable of. Enter stage left the K100D, the camera which puts that right with a considerably improved image processor and also adds Pentax's own Shake Reduction system.

Not only has Pentax improved in-camera image processing but they appear to have overtaken some of the competition, the amount of detail delivered is about as much as we could expect to see from a six megapixel CCD. On top of this they've also taken the sensible compromise of using a minimal amount of noise reduction and not turning down sharpening at higher sensitivities which means you get almost as much detail at ISO 1600 as you would at ISO 200. This combination means that assuming the 'input image' is sharp (good lens and/or stopped down slightly) you're going to get a great detailed image.

Our side-by-side comparison images show that there's really no advantage going from six to eight megapixels, jump to ten megapixels and you will get more detail although you do have to ask yourself how many times that extra detail will be visible in your final output (have you ever printed larger than A3, do you need to?).

One thing that may have helped to keep the K100D's price down is the choice of using AA / CR-V3 Lithium batteries to power the camera rather than supplying a rechargeable Lithium-Ion and charger which are more common these days. That said we used CR-V3 Lithium batteries in our K100D and the original set are still going strong after many hundreds of shots.

The clear step forward in image processing and the addition of Shake Reduction are enough to tip the K100D into our Highly Recommended category, this is the camera the *ist DS should have been and is a refreshing change from another strong Canon or Nikon.

Some sample images:

Mr. M · 12-04-2006, 01:29 AM

Thanks.

Beginner DSLRs (Body only):
Nikon D50 - £325 – 6mp.
Pentax K100/110 - £329 – 6mp
Canon EOS 350D (Digital Rebel XT) - £429 – 8mp

It's between these three, then.

I like the Canon best.

Choleric · 12-04-2006, 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mirage77

Thanks.

Beginner DSLRs (Body only):
Nikon D50 - £325 – 6mp.
Pentax K100/110 - £329 – 6mp
Canon EOS 350D (Digital Rebel XT) - £429 – 8mp

It's between these three, then.

I like the Canon best.

Here is a link to the review of the other two...
- ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

- ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

They're all Highly recommended. So you can't go wrong, just go to a store and play with them in your hands and see which fits you best.

Michael · 12-04-2006, 05:37 AM

I read the review yesterday. The camera is good and unique.

I do recommend that if this is the camera you are going to go with to remember that you are making a long time investment. Lenses, batteries, filters, etc., are things you make an investment in. If you have the monetary funds to do so in such a manner then do it. However, if in a couple of years you are going to want to swtic to Nikon or Canon, it will hurt.

Choleric · 12-04-2006, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael

I read the review yesterday. The camera is good and unique.

I do recommend that if this is the camera you are going to go with to remember that you are making a long time investment. Lenses, batteries, filters, etc., are things you make an investment in. If you have the monetary funds to do so in such a manner then do it. However, if in a couple of years you are going to want to swtic to Nikon or Canon, it will hurt.

Yes well like I have said before, in my case Pentax runs in the family, so my father already has about 5 pentax lenses, so i will be able to use those as well, so econimically buying Pentax is very practical for myself.

Michael · 12-05-2006, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Choleric

Yes well like I have said before, in my case Pentax runs in the family, so my father already has about 5 pentax lenses, so i will be able to use those as well, so econimically buying Pentax is very practical for myself.

Jeff, that is very good. I think you should definitely go with the Pentax then. It has gotten excellent reviews. Maybe you should wait a while though and swift around the dpreview forums to see what people say about it. You don't want to get one with the bugs from the factory.

Choleric · 12-12-2006, 11:24 PM

- ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

12-04-2006, 01:29 AM	#2
Mr. M Connoisseur Moderator Emeritus Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Singapore Posts: 6,103 Thanks: 2,036 Thanked 1,722 Times in 925 Posts	Re: Review: Pentax K100D Thanks. Beginner DSLRs (Body only): Nikon D50 - £325 – 6mp. Pentax K100/110 - £329 – 6mp Canon EOS 350D (Digital Rebel XT) - £429 – 8mp It's between these three, then. I like the Canon best.

12-04-2006, 05:37 AM	#4
Michael Devotee Moderator Emeritus Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 3,530 Thanks: 239 Thanked 323 Times in 196 Posts	Re: Review: Pentax K100D I read the review yesterday. The camera is good and unique. I do recommend that if this is the camera you are going to go with to remember that you are making a long time investment. Lenses, batteries, filters, etc., are things you make an investment in. If you have the monetary funds to do so in such a manner then do it. However, if in a couple of years you are going to want to swtic to Nikon or Canon, it will hurt.

12-12-2006, 11:24 PM	#7
Choleric Moderator Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Aksarben Posts: 3,201 Thanks: 613 Thanked 1,131 Times in 613 Posts	Re: Review: Pentax K100D - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Old Review Of The W140 600 SEL	Yaz	Mercedes-Benz Videos	3	07-23-2006 01:35 PM
CNET review the S550!	BMW_Dude	S-Class	2	05-01-2006 11:01 PM
Autoweek: Cayman review	Centurion	Cayman	8	04-02-2006 10:32 AM
Mercedes S-Class Review Roundup	Alx	S-Class	16	12-14-2005 04:43 PM