Japanese Car Zone - View Single Post

Michael · 08-24-2006, 09:06 AM

Nevadajack I won't being an immature argument with you about who is better. I basically said what I prefer, I did not say who is better.

Both Nikon and Canon are very good manufacturers of DSLR cameras. I have respect for Canon and would definitely buy one. I am actually considering this 400D because for the price nothing can beat it.

Does anyone know the fps for this camera?
Ah found it! It is 3 fps. That is good, but this camera really competes with the D80 rather than the D50. The D50 is a competitor for the 350D, or at least it was for sometime and/or was the intention of Nikon. However, now we see the new 400D out due the D50 by more than it did in the past. So, where does this leave us? The 400D has completely leaped the D50 and D70s(which in my opinion is being replaced by the D80).

08-24-2006, 09:06 AM	#6
Michael Devotee Moderator Emeritus Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 3,530 Thanks: 239 Thanked 323 Times in 196 Posts	Re: Canon EOS 400D Nevadajack I won't being an immature argument with you about who is better. I basically said what I prefer, I did not say who is better. Both Nikon and Canon are very good manufacturers of DSLR cameras. I have respect for Canon and would definitely buy one. I am actually considering this 400D because for the price nothing can beat it. Does anyone know the fps for this camera? Ah found it! It is 3 fps. That is good, but this camera really competes with the D80 rather than the D50. The D50 is a competitor for the 350D, or at least it was for sometime and/or was the intention of Nikon. However, now we see the new 400D out due the D50 by more than it did in the past. So, where does this leave us? The 400D has completely leaped the D50 and D70s(which in my opinion is being replaced by the D80).