Japanese Car Zone - View Single Post - R 320 CDI vs S 320 CDI

Just_me · 03-20-2006, 09:13 AM

Translated with babefish

R is nearly 15,000 euro more cheaply. Is R an alternative to S?

Tacho 100 - and both turn so ship-those-blessed 1500 routes. With 130 km/h there is 2000, with 200 indicates the needle then for the first time over 3000. But rage does not fit the self fuze, because it becomes noticeably more schlapper "obenrum". Excitingly consumption: With 8,4 litres (work) the s-class of 1.1 litres is under the r-class-thirst. For cars, which weigh empty two to 2.3 tons, a very good value.

But the driver life takes place in the interior: It gives in front with both nothing too meckern. In second and third row R spoils with comfortable single seats, whereby the rear pair must together-move somewhat closer and be larger none than 1.80 meters should. In the rear useful loading space variations are missing to the s-class. Except a ski bag (342 euro) for the central arm rest there is nothing. However the price list offers each quantity of special seats. They can heat, cool and mass - ideally for a representative chief car. Which R with security not will wants - and also does not become.

Chassis and suspension show up the heavyweights grown. The s-class is noticeably more comfortable owing to pneumatic cushioning than their cousin from the USA, who pulls the ESP brake in to fastcurves rather, whereby he works then somewhat more nervously. Both nevertheless are well controllably and dearest on be enough-strain at home: Approximately three meters wheel base speak for steadfast straight line discharge.

The classical author S has to be replaced in the house Mercedes by nothing. If at all, then by the e-class. But R might not pain-do both particularly. Because a car, which wants to be at the same time sedan, combination and SUV, which must be received compromises. Its truempfe are variability and giant available space, deficiency the not completely so precise processing as well as the heavy operated rear seat. Comfort king remains the s-class.

03-20-2006, 09:13 AM	#1
Just_me Executive Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Posts: 15,487 Thanks: 1,062 Thanked 3,722 Times in 1,583 Posts	R 320 CDI vs S 320 CDI - which is the best? Translated with babefish R is nearly 15,000 euro more cheaply. Is R an alternative to S? Tacho 100 - and both turn so ship-those-blessed 1500 routes. With 130 km/h there is 2000, with 200 indicates the needle then for the first time over 3000. But rage does not fit the self fuze, because it becomes noticeably more schlapper "obenrum". Excitingly consumption: With 8,4 litres (work) the s-class of 1.1 litres is under the r-class-thirst. For cars, which weigh empty two to 2.3 tons, a very good value. But the driver life takes place in the interior: It gives in front with both nothing too meckern. In second and third row R spoils with comfortable single seats, whereby the rear pair must together-move somewhat closer and be larger none than 1.80 meters should. In the rear useful loading space variations are missing to the s-class. Except a ski bag (342 euro) for the central arm rest there is nothing. However the price list offers each quantity of special seats. They can heat, cool and mass - ideally for a representative chief car. Which R with security not will wants - and also does not become. Chassis and suspension show up the heavyweights grown. The s-class is noticeably more comfortable owing to pneumatic cushioning than their cousin from the USA, who pulls the ESP brake in to fastcurves rather, whereby he works then somewhat more nervously. Both nevertheless are well controllably and dearest on be enough-strain at home: Approximately three meters wheel base speak for steadfast straight line discharge. The classical author S has to be replaced in the house Mercedes by nothing. If at all, then by the e-class. But R might not pain-do both particularly. Because a car, which wants to be at the same time sedan, combination and SUV, which must be received compromises. Its truempfe are variability and giant available space, deficiency the not completely so precise processing as well as the heavy operated rear seat. Comfort king remains the s-class.